For a longer version of this and other Science
& Society stories, visit www.sciencenews.org
President proposes higher levels
of science spending in fiscal 2011
By Rachel Ehrenberg
Given the economy, research societies
seemed pleased that the Obama administration plans on giving to science. The
president’s budget for fiscal 2011, released
February 1, proposes $147.7 billion for
federal spending on research and development. Of that, nondefense-related
funding would be $66 billion, a 5. 9 percent increase over what was allocated in
2010. Some programs, such as the Yucca
Mountain nuclear waste facility and
NASA’s Constellation program, met an
early death in the budget. Most agencies
would see modest increases.
“Given that there’s an overall freeze,
you had to hope that the president was
going to be true to his promise to use
a scalpel rather than a hatchet,” says
Albert Teich, director of science and pol-
icy programs at the American Associa-
tion for the Advancement of Science in
Washington, D.C. “That seems to be the
case. Within the budget, science seems
to be treated pretty well.”
Proposed Department of Energy
initiatives include more than $108 mil-
lion for research on renewable energy
sources. About $174 million would fund
research intended to improve the reliabil-
ity, efficiency and security — including
cybersecurity — of the nation’s electrical
transmission and distribution networks.
FY 2009 FY 2010
U.S. agency or department actual estimate
defense (military only)* 81,121 81,090
NIH (and other HHS R&d) 41,658 31,177
Energy 13,268 10,693
NASA 11,677 9,286
NSF 7,576 5,092
Agriculture 2,613 2,591
Commerce 1,969 1,516
Homeland Security 1,096 1,150
Interior 775 755
EPA 559 622
Other Agencies and departments 3,159 3,381
TOTAL 165,471 147,353
Figures reflect rounding, Fy 2009 column includes one-time Recovery Act funds
† difference between 2010 and 2011, adjusted for 1. 1 percent expected rate of inflation
*Other agency budgets include some defense-related, nonmilitary projects
Federal research and development funding
Proposed fiscal year 2011 budget by agency, in millions of dollars
SOURCE: AdAPTEd FROM OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT ANd BUdGET
FY 2011 Percent
proposed change†
77,548 - 5. 4
32,156 2.0
11,219 3. 8
10,986 17.0
5,571 8. 2
2,448 - 6. 5
1,727 12. 7
1,046 - 10.0
772 1. 1
651 3. 5
3,572 4. 5
147,696 -0.9
Increase Decrease
briefing. Recovery Act funding is not
included in the proposed 2011 budget.
NASA’s budget will go up by $6 billion
over the next five years under the plan.
The plan earmarks an extra $183 million
to extend the life of the International
Space Station past its planned retirement date of 2016 and allots $5 billion
for space and Earth science research,
including grants, telescopes and missions to study the moon and Mars.
The biggest shake-up was the cancellation of the Constellation program, which
was to return astronauts to the moon by
2020 and has already cost some $9 billion
over the past four years. An independent
panel found that the program was behind
schedule and underfunded.
NASA will instead focus on developing new “game-changing” technologies
to take humans beyond low-Earth orbit
by increasing cooperation with and reliance on commercial space companies.
The proposed budget would expand the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s
spending on programs addressing climate
change and promoting clean energy. EPA
Administrator Lisa Jackson noted that the
largest increase in her agency’s research
budget would bump up spending on Science to Achieve Results research grants
to $87 million, an increase of more than
40 percent. EPA is also slated to receive
$26 million to study hormone-mimicking
pollutants and other chemicals, $6 million more than this year.
The National Science Foundation budget would increase by some 8 percent,
adjusted for inflation, in 2011. In addition
to spending on basic research, NSF supports education and training programs.
The 2011 fiscal year starts on October 1.
Congress will decide what the final budget will include.
“The administration’s taken a pretty
positive approach towards science and
technology,” says Teich. “We have to hope
that Congress does the same thing.”
Nathan Seppa, Sid Perkins, Laura
Sanders, Janet Raloff and Lisa Grossman
contributed to this report.
A. NANdy
www.sciencenews.org