that have nothing to do with the electric
dipole moment.… If you accidentally
apply a small magnetic field that changes
along with the electric field, it can really
be a dangerous type of error.”
The way forward
Yet another group is taking a fresh
approach to molecules: stripping off one
electron so that the molecule has a positive charge. Because they are electrically
charged, such molecular ions can be
easily confined and studied.
Eric Cornell, a Nobel-winning physicist at JILA in Boulder, Colo., started
the molecular ion trend seven years ago,
when he wondered how he could design
an experiment from scratch to detect
the electron electric dipole moment.
He walked down the hall and took the
elevators to the office of JILA theorist
John Bohn. Handing Bohn a thick stack
of manila folders, one per candidate molecule, Cornell asked him to calculate
which molecular ion had the best chance
of being studied for an electron electric
dipole moment.
centre for cold Matter/iMperial college london, www3.iMperial.ac.uK/ccM, adapted by t. dubÉ
Several detailed papers later, Bohn had
a list of candidates. All of them had the
peculiar property of having electrons in
what’s called a “triplet delta” state. That
property makes the dipole moment easier
to measure because when scientists apply
the electric field, they can also simultaneously measure any magnetic field that
might result — the very sorts of fields that
can trip up the measurements. “There’s
sort of a built-in way in the molecule to
monitor what the magnetic field is doing,”
says Aaron Leanhardt, a former postdoc
in Cornell’s lab who now works at the
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
Cornell is now starting to build an
experiment to measure one of the ions,
known as hafnium fluoride plus, in this
triplet delta state. But so little is known
about these molecular ions that his team
must first do basic studies on the ions’
physical properties. “We’re mapping out
this terra incognita,” Cornell says. Once
he gets to measuring the dipole moment,
he says, “I think I can do it better.”
Some scientists can’t be bothered fuss-
ing with individual atoms and molecules,
Beyond the standard though
the electron’s electric dipole moment,
or edM, hasn’t been detected, experiments keep lowering the bar on how big
it could be. reducing that limit can rule
out theories that go beyond physics’
standard model. in further experiments,
scientists hope to reject some leading
ideas. source: iMperial college london
10–22
Electron EDM predictions for some
standard model extensions
10–24
Charge × centimeters
10–26
10–34
12
10–28
10–30
10–32
3
Current
limit
4
Future
limit
10–36 Standard model
1. the multi-Higgs model calls for multiple types of the higgs particle, the
as-yet-undiscovered particle thought
to imbue others with mass.
2. in left-right symmetric models,
particles behave the same way
even if their direction of spin (or
other qualities that are left-right
dependent) is reversed.
3. the minimal supersymmetric
standard model, or MSSM, is a
standard model extension that
holds that every elementary particle
has a “superpartner.” one of the
simplest versions has been ruled
out by the current limit.
4. another version of MSSM that
sets a parameter dubbed phi to a
different value is still a possibility,
but it too may be ruled out when
researchers lower the bar further.
and instead are trying big chunks of
solids. Such materials contain untold
numbers of electrons to measure; the
idea is to apply an electric field that
would line up a fraction of the electron
spins in the same direction as the electric
field. The researchers try to detect the
resulting magnetization — which in this
case is not a problem, but the actual
signal they are trying to measure.
At Yale, physicists Steve Lamoreaux
and Alex Sushkov think they can succeed
with ceramic materials whose electron
spins naturally align, a property that
enhances the effect of an applied electric
field. The researchers apply high voltage
to a sample of material, about the size of
a quarter, sitting in liquid helium. Using
a supersensitive magnetometer, they
detect magnetization in the ceramic as
the electric field reverses. “We study all
the physical effects going on in the sam-
ple to make sure that what we detect is
from the EDM rather than something
else,” Sushkov says.
Explore more
s imperial college london site on the
electron edM: http://j.mp/hkklon
february 12, 2011 | science news | 25