the best treatment, Altschuler says this
new approach differs because, in principle, it would allow a doctor to look at
every cell in a tumor biopsy, identifying
clues that would get lost in a “population
averaging” approach.
Multiplying traits
But fluorescent microscopy has its own
limitations. Scientists can look for only
a handful of variations, or biomarkers,
in a cell at one time. Though cells carrying biomarker A could be distinguished
from those carrying B or C, for example,
scientists can’t simultaneously scan the
cells for a second characteristic that
might be important in understanding
the first.
Altschuler and Wu’s team has found
ways to maximize the use of fluorescent
probes to get more details on cell-to-cell differences. Using three out of four
available probes to home in on subpopulations of interest, a fourth probe can
be free to search for a second variation
within each of those groups. By running
a series of experiments, rotating the
fourth marker’s target each time, scientists can get more detailed information
on members in each group.
Say you’re trying to understand peo-
ple at a baseball stadium, instead of
cells, and you want to figure out differ-
ences in the way the players, vendors
and fans dress. Three out of four fluores-
cent probes would be used to separate
people into each of these groups. The
fourth probe could then search for a spe-
cific item, such as sneakers, which may
be worn by members in each group. In
subsequent experiments, the first three
probes remain set to identify players,
vendors and fans, while the fourth spots
people sporting home-team jerseys, then
baseball caps and so on. A computer pro-
gram stitches together the information
gleaned from the serial studies to show
what people in each group wear.
Live on and inform
Such clues to what’s going on inside single cells often come at a price: Cells are
damaged or killed in the process, providing only a single snapshot in time. This
makes it hard to predict how a single cell
will respond to a given stimulus.
J. Christopher Love, a chemical engi-neer-turned immunologist at MIT, combines the idea of separating cells and the
helpfulness of fluorescent dyes to follow
biochemical processes over time in living cells. His lab takes an array of sub-nanoliter-sized wells and fills each with
either a single immune cell or a small
group of them. With tens of thousands
of wells, the unit looks like an ice cube
tray the size of a microscope slide. Fluorescent markers identify the various
proteins in or on each cell, distinguishing one cell type from another.
Over the course of several hours or
days, Love studies the proteins and
chemicals secreted by the cells to see
how they change. Borrowing a technique
from the printing of U.S. dollar bills, he
presses the microarray against a glass
plate to get a printout (so to speak) of
the proteins and chemicals secreted by
the cells. Unlike Allbritton’s work, the
Trouble with averages for a long time scientists had no choice but to study cells by looking at the average behavior of an entire population.
today, many researchers are developing analytical techniques that get around the inherent problems (some below) of this approach.
average
Number of cells
Single cell measurement
an average may roughly reflect how most cells
behave, but it doesn’t capture behaviors that
fall far from the center of a bell curve.
average
Number of cells
Single cell measurement
sometimes an average can hide a smaller
subpopulation of cells with behaviors that
may differ from the larger group.
average
Number of cells
Single cell measurement
if the cells are split into two subpopulations,
the average may reflect how only a handful of
cells actually behave.