“The big idea in social psychology is
that social behavior is unconsciously
influenced by cues in the environment,
but the evidence for that idea needs to be
much better,” says cognitive psychologist David Shanks of University College
London.
Walk this way
Much of the current fuss over priming
concerns Bargh-directed experiments
described in an influential 1996 paper.
College students unscrambled sentences
that, for one group, contained words
related to stereotypes about the elderly,
such as wrinkle and Florida. Upon finishing, participants who had read old age–
related words took about a second longer
to walk down an exit hallway than peers
who had perused age-neutral words.
A string of unnoticed, stereotypical
references to the elderly slyly evoked
thoughts of physical deterioration with
age, prompting healthy young adults
to slow down, Bargh proposed (SN:
10/30/99, p. 280).
Cognitive psychologist Stéphane
Doyen of Université Libre de Bruxelles
in Belgium has long felt that something was out of step with Bargh’s findings. A team led by Doyen reproduced
Bargh’s slow-walk effect, but only when
students recruited to lead the experiments were first briefed to expect such
responses from participants who read
age-related words.
Volunteers primed with elderly stereotypes didn’t change their pace when the
experiment’s leaders had no knowledge
or expectations about the trials (or when
experimenters were told to expect that
primed volunteers would walk faster),
the team reported online January 18 in
PLo S ONE. Taken together, these results
suggest that old-age references coaxed
students into a leisurely strut only when
experimenters provided inadvertent
encouragement to slow down, perhaps
via facial expressions or body language,
Doyen proposes.
Although volunteers reported no
awareness of having read words about
old age in Bargh’s experiment, they may
still have been consciously aware of
the priming, Doyen says. After testing,
primed participants in Doyen’s study
were shown pictures of four people from
different social categories and asked to
pick one that could have been related to
words used in scrambled sentences. An
image of an elderly person was chosen
markedly more often than an athlete, an
Arab or a physically handicapped individual, suggesting participants were at
least somewhat aware that they’d read
words about old age.
People may find it difficult to articulate
themes associated with words in scrambled sentences even when faintly aware
of those themes. “A lot of precautions
should be taken to test for unconscious
priming effects,” Doyen says.
Even simple experimental actions
can give away the game to volunteers.
Consider evidence that people judge
hills to be steeper after donning heavy
backpacks. Investigators initially suggested that a weighty prime on the spine
makes terrain look tougher to negotiate,
so nearby hills take on added slant.
In a new study directed by psychologist Frank Durgin of Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania, an experimenter
told some participants not to let wearing
a backpack affect their judgments. Estimates of a hill’s angle were comparably
accurate whether these volunteers toted
a pack or not. What’s more, many backpack wearers, regardless of what they’d
been told, admitted after the trial that
they thought the load had been intended
to make the hill seem steeper.
Shanks says such findings suggest that
recruits for psychology experiments
quickly draw conclusions about what’s
expected and how to behave, regardless
of any unintended signals from researchers. That makes it devilishly hard to study
social behavior. Durgin’s study illustrates
the need to account for participants’
unspoken assumptions about the purposes of priming trials, Shanks says.
File-drawer rescue
It’s a truly steep climb to cart unsuc-
cessful replications of other scientists’
studies up Mount Publication. Major
journals make no secret of preferring
papers that describe novel advances
and attract media attention, says psy-
chologist Hal Pashler of the University
of California, San Diego. Not surpris-
ingly, failed replications often get filed
and forgotten, meaning studies that sup-
port priming have gotten more attention
than those that don’t.
Do-over data an attempt to replicate a
1996 priming study did not find a difference in
how fast volunteers walked after reading words
related to old age (top). the do-over, which used
infrared sensors to get objective time measurements, did turn up an effect when experimenters were told to expect slow walking (bottom).
10
Neutral
Condition
Priming and speed in two studies
Elderly
Walking time (sec)
8
6
4
2
0
Original
Do-over
Study
Priming, speed and expectation
8
Condition
Walking time (sec)
Neutral
6
4
2
0
Elderly
Slow Fast
Expectation in do-over
sources, froM top: J.a. bargh ET AL/J. OF PERSONALITY AND
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 1996; s. doyen ET AL/PLOS ONE 2012