SCIENCE
NEWS
This Week
The scientists used a technique that they
crafted to identify the short period when
a particular gene is turned on as a fetus
develops. The tool may give clues to the
cause of cleft palate and other birth defects
in people.
The process that creates a complex,
multicellular animal out of a single fertilized egg cell typically relies on the coordinated activity of thousands of genes. Individual genes must create proteins precisely
when they’re needed, and the genes often
turn on and off more than once during
development.
Scientists have a variety of tools to investigate the roles that each gene plays
throughout this process. However, most of
those tools eliminate a gene or permanently
shut off its activity early in development.
Scientists can’t then tell at what time the
gene’s activity becomes important.
“That’s a level of precision that we
haven’t been able to achieve,” says Michael
Longaker, a pediatric craniofacial surgeon
at Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, Calif.
To gain more insight into the timing of
gene activity, Longaker and his colleagues
focused on a mouse gene called glycogen
synthase kinase-3sz (GSK-3sz). Previous
studies had linked this gene to palate and
breastbone development.
The researchers engineered mice with a
chemical tag on GSK-3sz that made the protein produced by this gene degrade rapidly.
Like mice engineered to lack the gene, they
developed cleft palates and malformed
breastbones, and they died at birth.
However, the chemical tag was constructed so that a drug called rapamycin
would prevent the GSK-3sz protein from
degrading. When the researchers gave
rapamycin throughout pregnancy to
female mice carrying fetuses with the
chemical tag, the babies were born healthy
and didn’t show the typical birth defects.
To specify when fetuses need the GSK-3sz
protein to develop normally, Longaker’s
team gave rapamycin during a variety of
2-day stretches to groups of female mice
carrying fetuses with the chemical tag. The
researchers report in an upcoming Nature,
published online on Feb. 11, that the
GSK-3sz protein participates in palate
development and breastbone formation at
different times. Mice whose mothers were
treated with the drug between 13.5 to 15
days after gestation were spared cleft palates,
but normal breastbone development
required treatment between days 15.5 to 17.
“This really nails down the windows
when the gene is critical,” Longaker says.
Randall Peterson, a developmental biologist at Massachusetts General Hospital in
Boston, calls the new technique “pretty
exciting.” He says, “What you really want is
the ability to test when specific genes are
required and what roles they play at different times during development. This technique allows you to do that with decent temporal control.”
A better grasp of which genes are important at which times during development,
Peterson adds, may eventually enable physicians to treat cleft palate and other birth
defects before a baby is born. —C. BROWNLEE
Perils of
Migration
New evidence that bats
stalk birds
Big Mediterranean bats snatch migrating
songbirds out of the night sky in spring
and fall, according to a new study.
When researchers proposed that idea
in 2001, “there was so much controversy,”
says Ana Popa-Lisseanu of the Doñana
Biological Station in Seville, Spain. Now,
she and her colleagues have cooperated
with the idea’s main critic, a conservation
biologist at the University of Bern in
Switzerland, to settle their argument.
The bats’ blood chemistry points to
bird feasts during migration season, the
former disputants now agree. Their joint
study appears online in the February
PLoS ONE.
Billions of birds travel across the
Mediterranean region twice each year.
Most migrants use what had seemed to be
safe flyways hundreds of meters above
ground at night.
Yet danger now appears to loom,
although no scientist has reported seeing
a bat snag a bird. In 2000, two researchers
in Italy reported that droppings from the
giant noctule bat (Nyctalus lasiopterus)
contained bits of bird feathers. Debate
flared the next year after the Doñana
researchers also reported feathers in noctule droppings (SN: 8/11/01, p. 86).
In 2003, Bern conservation biologist
Raphaël Arlettaz and a colleague published a contrary scenario: Stray feathers
waft down from migrating birds, and bats
mistake them for night-flying insects.
“Feathers in droppings are no proof that
you eat bird flesh but certainly [are proof ]
that you swallow feathers,” says Arlettaz.
After Popa-Lisseanu joined the Seville
group in 2003, it began looking for a good
test of whether bats eat birds. The team
decided to track the bat’s diet by measur-
NIGHT STALKER The giant noctule bat is
more than a match for a migrating songbird
that weighs as little as 6 grams. The bat’s
wingspan can reach 45 centimeters, and the
bat can weigh 50 gm.
ing the ratios of rare-but-stable forms to
the common forms of carbon and nitrogen
in the bats and their potential prey. Working with Arlettaz, the researchers established that the migrating birds have higher
ratios of carbon-13 and nitrogen-15 than
the local insects do.
For 2 years, the researchers periodically took blood samples from as many
giant noctules as they could catch.
Monthly numbers varied, for example,
from 3 to 18 during spring, summer, and
fall of 2003.
The isotope ratios in a bat’s blood
change within a day to reflect what it’s
eaten. In summer, the researchers found,
the ratios stayed relatively low, indicating
a regular insect diet. In spring, the ratios
were a bit higher, and in fall, they jumped
out of the insect-diet range.
The results support the idea that bats
prey on migrating birds. To get the
observed rise in isotope ratio, the bats
must actually be digesting bird tissue, the
researchers conclude.
“I was one of the major detractors,” says
Arlettaz, “but with good evidence, I have
now changed my mind completely. The
most virulent detractors become the best
proponents.”
Michael J. Ryan of the University of
Texas at Austin, who has studied bats that
eat frogs, says that the new finding “makes
perfect sense, as long as the bats are big
and the birds are small.” —S. MILIUS
POPA-LISSEANU